Tag: product management leadership

  • Operations vs Algorithms: How I Scale Startups with Data Science, Team Design, and Pre-Mortems

    Operations vs Algorithms: How I Scale Startups with Data Science, Team Design, and Pre-Mortems

    I recently revisited one of the most practical conversations I’ve had about scaling: insights from Ian Wong, co-founder and CTO of Opendoor. Before founding Opendoor, Ian was Square’s first data scientist, where he developed machine learning models and infrastructure for fraud detection. That trajectory—building from operational muscle to algorithmic advantage—maps closely to how I’ve led product and data investments in fast-growing environments.

    As Ian puts it, in the early innings it might make sense for your startup to be operations heavy. But as you start to scale, data science becomes a critical component for running a business with longevity in mind. This mirrors my experience: hands-on operations create the learning loops you need early, while data science turns those learnings into scalable systems, better forecasts, and tighter risk controls.

    We dive into how both Square and Opendoor approached this transition. The progression is instructive—start with pragmatic operational workflows to validate demand and unit economics, then shift toward machine learning and automation once the process is stable, the data pipeline is trustworthy, and the cost of manual work begins to drag margins and responsiveness.

    Along those lines, we discuss some of the early considerations for your fledgling data science team, including the type of folks to hire for the early team, like whether to look for generalists or specialists, and how to set up your interview loops. In my playbook, I bias toward T-shaped generalists first—people who can partner with product, analytics, and engineering—then layer in specialists (ML ops, causal inference, experimentation) as complexity grows. For interview loops, I ensure we evaluate for problem framing, data intuition, model-to-product translation, and stakeholder communication—not just model accuracy.

    Ian also dives into his lessons on structuring the data science function so that it’s deeply integrated with the rest of the technical org. I’ve found embedded pods work best early—data scientists sit with product teams to accelerate discovery, instrumentation, and iteration—paired with a light central platform group to standardize data quality, experimentation frameworks, and model deployment practices.

    Next, we dive into some of his biggest lessons as a first-time founder and CTO, including his practice with Opendoor’s leadership team of doing pre-mortems to predict why something might not work. He also encourages founders to run through a bi-yearly exercise of re-writing their job rec. I’ve seen both rituals raise the bar: pre-mortems surface hidden risks before launch, and re-writing the job rec forces leaders to shed responsibilities, prevent role drift, and keep the org structured for the next stage—not the last one.

    Practically, my guidance to founders and product leaders is straightforward: define the decisions data science will improve (pricing, risk, routing, personalization), instrument for leading indicators, and ruthlessly prioritize the smallest models that deliver outsized business value. Avoid premature optimization—let operations teach you where the algorithm belongs. Use clear success metrics to track outcomes, not just output, and revisit them as your market and product expand.

    Finally, remember that the goal isn’t to replace operations—it’s to make operations smarter. Pair human judgment with machine learning in the workflows that matter most, invest in trustworthy data foundations, and build hiring and interview loops that reward interdisciplinary problem solvers. That’s how you turn early operational grit into durable, data-driven advantage.


    Book a consult png image
  • Airtable’s Journey to Product-Market Fit: Hard-Won Lessons on Building Horizontal Products

    Airtable’s Journey to Product-Market Fit: Hard-Won Lessons on Building Horizontal Products

    I recently dove deep with Andrew Ofstad, co-founder of Airtable, to unpack Airtable’s path to product-market fit and the realities of building a truly horizontal product. As a product leader, I’m always looking for patterns that translate across teams and stages — and this conversation offered a wealth of practical insights for founders and product managers alike.

    We started with first principles: how the founders came together, their vision for the product, and what the initial prototypes looked like. That early narrative matters — it anchors positioning, keeps scope disciplined, and ensures your earliest builds reflect the core value proposition rather than a laundry list of features.

    From there, we stepped through Airtable’s alpha, beta, and launch timelines, as well as their early traction. I pay close attention to these milestones because they reveal the learning cadence: how quickly teams validated hypotheses, which signals they treated as leading indicators, and how they balanced qualitative pull with quantitative adoption during product discovery.

    We also explored the challenges of creating a horizontal product that can do many things, including identifying initial use cases and figuring out how to describe what they were building. In my experience, the key is to land a small set of canonical use cases, articulate crisp jobs-to-be-done, and build narrative clarity around the “why now.” Without this, even great products struggle to convert curiosity into active usage.

    On commercialization, we dug into how to approach pricing and competition, as well as their early go-to-market strategy. For products with broad applicability, I’ve found that founder-led GTM is essential early on — it shortens the learning loop and informs SaaS pricing and packaging. Start with simple, customer-aligned tiers, validate willingness to pay against clear outcomes, and keep positioning focused on value, not feature parity.

    We then looked ahead to what the next 3 years will look like for Airtable, and how they’ve navigated scaling while staying true to their vision. Scaling a horizontal product requires tight product roadmapping and sprint planning, strong messaging discipline, and an unwavering commitment to the core value — all while layering ecosystem leverage, templates, and community to accelerate adoption without diluting the product’s identity.

    Whether you’re a founder validating your own idea, or a product leader looking for growth advice, there are tons of tactics here that go much deeper than the typical founding stories you hear. My takeaway: great horizontal products find product-market fit by starting narrow in use case, obsessing over teachability, and letting customer outcomes pull the roadmap forward.


    Inspired by this post on First Round.


    Book a consult png image
  • Inside Figma’s 5-Phase Community-Led Growth Playbook to Ignite Organic GTM

    Inside Figma’s 5-Phase Community-Led Growth Playbook to Ignite Organic GTM

    When I study companies that turn product-market fit into durable, compounding momentum, Figma stands out. In this breakdown, I walk through Figma’s five phases of community-led growth and share how I’d apply each step to build an organic growth engine. My lens is product management leadership paired with pragmatic GTM thinking, so the emphasis is on what to do, when to do it, and why it works.

    Phase 1 centers on the lessons from years in stealth mode — specifically, how to start planting the seeds for a community when you don’t have a fully-formed product. I focus on the inflection point to emerge from stealth, what signals matter, and how to use early feedback loops for product discovery without over-rotating on feature requests. Quietly building is necessary; quietly engaging is essential.

    In this early phase, my playbook prioritizes rigorous product discovery, crisp problem narratives, and a cadence that makes learning visible. I invest in relationship-building with credible early adopters, share prototypes thoughtfully, and shape outcomes over output through disciplined product roadmapping and sprint planning. The goal is to design a community that feels invited into the creative process while preserving the integrity of your vision.

    Phase 2 is all about the launch playbook — from taking over design Twitter, to marketing to folks who tend to bristle at traditional SaaS marketing. Here, founder-led GTM matters. I pair zero to one B2B marketing with specific audience rituals, leaning into channels where the product can be experienced, not just described. The message avoids enterprise jargon and instead showcases feel, speed, and collaboration, so the community can instantly “get it.”

    Phase 3 shifts the focus to activation via community gravity. The goal is to get folks to try the product, even if they weren’t going to switch over right away to designing in Figma full-time. This is where I formalize an evangelist strategy — spotlighting workflows, templates, and stories that reduce the cost of the first session. I think about developer evangelism patterns applied to designers: celebrate makers, distribute small wins widely, and build momentum with authentic, peer-to-peer proof.

    The final two phases connect passionate individual users to an enterprise strategy. They didn’t layer in a sales team until four years after the product launched, and didn’t add a paid product tier until another two years after that. Those choices underscore a disciplined sequencing of PLG with a sales overlay — land with love, expand with proof, monetize with timing.

    In practice, this means evolving from bottoms-up adoption to clear value narratives for team and enterprise tiers, while tuning SaaS pricing and packaging to customer maturity. I optimize the handoff from product-led signals to sales motions, align success metrics to outcomes (not just usage), and enable procurement-friendly paths without dulling what made the product magical. That’s the GTM trade-off: protect the community engine while scaling into enterprise.

    If you’re building your own community-led growth engine, these phases offer a durable blueprint: learn in stealth, launch where your audience lives, activate with authentic evangelism, and scale with a thoughtful enterprise bridge. Done well, this approach compounds — it strengthens product-market fit, accelerates zero to one B2B marketing, and sets the stage for sustainable growth without overreliance on paid channels.


    Book a consult png image
  • From Roadmaps to Sprints: Proven Tactics to Ship Software at Scale Without Chaos

    From Roadmaps to Sprints: Proven Tactics to Ship Software at Scale Without Chaos

    I recently sat down with Snir Kodesh, Head of Engineering at Retool, a development platform for building custom business tools. Before joining Retool, he spent six years as a Senior Director of Engineering at Lyft. Coming from my vantage point leading product at HighLevel, I was eager to compare notes on what it really takes to ship software at scale without losing clarity, customer focus, or team morale.

    We dug into the biggest differences between leading engineering teams for a consumer product versus an enterprise platform — and the patterns that hold true across both. Consumer surfaces demand rapid iteration loops and relentless UX polish; enterprise platforms demand configurability, security, reliability, and stakeholder alignment across buyers and users. In my experience, the constant across both worlds is crisp product management leadership: clear problem definition, tight feedback loops, and unambiguous ownership.

    We pulled back the curtain on the software development cycle, starting with setting the product roadmap while balancing a diverse set of customer needs. On roadmapping, I ensure we explicitly identify who’s in the room to represent product, engineering and design, as well as customer-facing teams like support and solutions. The most effective sessions make trade-offs visible: we quantify impact, risk, and effort; we surface dependencies; and we align on outcomes before timelines. The result is not just a list of features, but a sequenced narrative that earns the right to build.

    From there, we discussed how engineering takes that product roadmap and turns it into a concrete plan of action using the “try, do, consider” framework. I’ve found this framing incredibly practical: “try” creates space for low-risk experiments, “do” commits to high-confidence work, and “consider” tracks explorations that need more discovery. When sprint planning inherits this taxonomy, teams retain momentum without overcommitting — and leaders get a transparent view into where learning versus delivery is happening.

    He makes the case for leaning on QBRs instead of OKRs. I agree that quarterly business reviews calibrate teams on real outcomes, not vanity metrics, and they naturally force prioritization around customer value. When we do use OKRs, we emphasize outcomes vs output OKRs so teams aren’t incentivized to ship volume over impact. In practice, QBRs keep us honest: what shipped, what moved the needle, and what needs to change next quarter.

    We also tackled why scope creep gets a bad rap. In my experience, what’s labeled as “scope creep” is often legitimate learning uncovered through product discovery. The key is disciplined change management: time-box discovery, explicitly re-baseline when new information emerges, and separate must-haves from nice-to-haves. When done well, this turns surprises into strategic clarity rather than delivery risk.

    On estimation, we shared practical tactics for getting better at estimating how long a feature will actually take to complete. I lean on reference-class forecasting (compare to similar past work), risk burndown charts, explicit buffers for integration and QA, and a habit of capturing deltas between estimate and actuals. Over time, this creates a trustworthy velocity signal and sharpens intuition across both product and engineering.

    Translating the roadmap to sprint planning is where execution quality shows. We align on definitions of ready and done, maintain code review SLAs, budget a percentage for tech debt, and instrument everything so we can spot drift early. The “try, do, consider” framework maps cleanly to backlog hygiene, keeping discovery visible without derailing delivery. This is how we sustain speed and quality at scale.

    Finally, we zoomed out to essential advice for engineering leaders — especially folks scaling quickly from leading a small team to a much bigger one. Shift from direct control to leverage: clarify decision rights, invest in Staff+ ICs, and scale communication through operating cadences, decision logs, and crisp narratives. Pair autonomy with accountability using QBRs, and keep product discovery tight to preserve customer empathy as you add layers. The goal is the same at ten people or a thousand: ship valuable software predictably, learn fast, and keep the team energized.

    If you’re navigating the leap from product roadmapping to sprint planning, these patterns are battle-tested. Anchor on outcomes, use the “try, do, consider” lens to manage ambiguity, and treat scope as a living artifact informed by discovery. With the right rituals and metrics, you can ship software at scale — without chaos.


    Book a consult png image
  • My Playbook for the First 10 Hires: Lessons from Steven Bartel on Gem & Dropbox

    My Playbook for the First 10 Hires: Lessons from Steven Bartel on Gem & Dropbox

    I sat down with Steven Bartel, co-founder and CEO of Gem, to go deep on what really works when you’re making the very first critical hires in a startup. As a builder and operator, I know how much early talent decisions determine product velocity, culture, and ultimately whether the team can execute founder-led GTM with confidence.

    Before building the talent acquisition platform, Steven was an early engineer at Dropbox, where he spent 5 years working on analytics, Dropbox Paper, and hiring as the company grew from 25 to 1500 people.

    This experience from Dropbox, combined with his lessons from building out Gem’s own team and talking to his customer base of recruiters makes Steven the perfect person to talk to about early-stage recruiting.

    In our conversation we focus on how to make those fourth, fifth, or tenth hires — those really early days when your startup has zero brand recognition or recruiting help. Here’s a preview of his tactical advice, paired with my product leadership lens on what to actually do next.

    A trick for sourcing second-degree network connections. I’ve used this same approach to turn lukewarm interest into warm intros by mapping mutual connectors across former teammates, investors, advisors, and early customers. The goal is to engineer serendipity: stack-rank warm paths, ask for specific intros, and close the loop quickly with crisp role requirements and a two-sentence value proposition.

    The power of sending a “break-up” message in your candidate outreach. When a candidate goes quiet, a polite, time-bounded note that gives them an easy out often re-engages the conversation. It respects their time, signals high standards, and creates a natural moment for them to opt back in—very similar to enterprise follow-ups in founder-led sales.

    How Gem brought candidates on to work with them in very structured trial periods before making a full-time offer. I’ve found structured trials invaluable for de-risking early hires: define a scoped project, align on success criteria, and ensure tight feedback loops. This mirrors a product discovery sprint—short, measurable, and collaborative—while giving both sides a realistic preview of working together.

    Advice for working on your recruiting pitch and nurturing passive talent. Your pitch should evolve like your product narrative: lead with the mission, the unique wedge, and the precise problems a candidate will own in the next 90 days. For passive talent, sequence lightweight touchpoints (demo the product, share a customer story, invite a technical deep dive) to build trust long before you ask for a decision.

    The similarities between early-stage hiring and founder-led sales. Both require targeted prospecting, tight messaging, and rigorous follow-through. The best founders and product leaders treat recruiting pipelines like revenue pipelines—measure response rates, iterate on messaging, and run structured, time-boxed cycles to convert high-signal candidates.

    If you’re navigating your first hiring wave, these principles will help you build a repeatable recruiting engine: amplify second-degree networks, use respectful “break-up” nudges, validate fit with structured trials, sharpen your pitch for passive talent, and apply founder-led sales discipline to every stage of the funnel. Do this well, and your early team becomes a durable competitive advantage.


    Inspired by this post on First Round.


    Book a consult png image
  • Founder-Led Customer Success: My Proven Playbook for NRR, Feedback Loops, and First CS Hires

    Founder-Led Customer Success: My Proven Playbook for NRR, Feedback Loops, and First CS Hires

    I’m constantly looking for battle-tested ways to operationalize founder-led customer success in B2B SaaS. In that spirit, I recently dug deep into the patterns that have powered Sydney Strader, VP of Customer Success at Catalyst. Prior to joining Catalyst, Sydney was the VP of Customer Success at InVision.

    Founder-led customer success is one of the most overlooked levers in early company building, yet it’s often the fastest path to durable retention, sharper product-market fit, and a more effective founder-led GTM. When I roll up my sleeves with founders, I focus on building tight feedback loops, defining accountability for net revenue retention, and sequencing the first customer success hire with intention.

    How to structure early customer check-ins, plus a framework to help surface more specific feedback. In practice, I run these as short, recurring sessions for the first 60–90 days, anchored on outcomes, not features. I use a simple cadence and agenda: confirm the customer’s jobs-to-be-done and success criteria, inspect friction along the critical path, quantify value moments, and close with two commitments (one for us, one for the customer). To elicit specificity, I lean on prompts like: “Walk me through the last time you used this,” “What almost made you stop?” and “What has to be true to consider this indispensable in 90 days?”

    The most impactful questions that founders and customer success managers should ask all their customers. My shortlist includes: What outcome did you hire us to achieve, and how will you measure it? What’s the single biggest blocker between you and that outcome right now? Which part of our product experience feels surprisingly valuable—and which feels like work? If this tool disappeared tomorrow, what would you do instead? What needs to happen for you to expand usage with confidence in the next quarter? These questions turn qualitative check-ins into quantifiable insight that sharpens product discovery and reduces churn risk.

    Why everyone at the company owns the net revenue retention metric — not just the customer success function. I treat NRR as a company-wide operating metric, not a department KPI. Product owns value creation and time-to-value; Sales owns expansion hygiene and deal quality; Marketing owns ideal customer profile clarity and expectation setting; Finance and RevOps instrument leading indicators like activation rate, feature adoption, and health scores. When we wire NRR into planning and OKRs across teams, we translate customer signals into roadmap priorities and revenue outcomes without handoffs getting lost.

    How to make your first customer success hire, from the ideal profile to structuring the interview process and setting comp. The ideal early CS leader is a builder-operator: consultative, technically fluent, comfortable in ambiguity, and obsessed with outcomes. I design interviews around live exercises—diagnose a customer scenario, map a 90-day success plan, and instrument a health score with leading and lagging indicators. For compensation, I favor a base/variable split with a meaningful portion tied to net revenue retention and adoption milestones, plus early equity to align with long-term value creation. This profile accelerates learning loops between customers, product, and go-to-market.

    The throughline across all of this is simple: founders who lead from the front on customer success compress the learning cycle that drives retention and efficient growth. By formalizing early check-ins, asking high-signal questions, making NRR a company sport, and hiring a builder for that first CS role, we turn customer conversations into a strategic engine for product management leadership and sustainable expansion.


    Inspired by this post on First Round.


    Book a consult png image
  • Scaling Your Co-Founder Relationship: Rituals, Decision Rights, and Trust Lessons from Labelbox

    Scaling Your Co-Founder Relationship: Rituals, Decision Rights, and Trust Lessons from Labelbox

    I’ve learned that a startup’s trajectory often mirrors the strength of its co-founder relationship. With that lens, I sat down to unpack how to scale trust, decision-making, and speed between co-founders as the company itself scales. Our guests are Manu Sharma and Brian Rieger, co-founders of Labelbox. In this interview, I take a microscope to their co-founder DNA, exploring the ins and outs of how they’ve made the relationship work over the years. We traced how Manu and Brian came together as co-founders and landed on the idea for Labelbox. That origin story matters: it reveals the early signals of shared conviction, complementary experience, and a clear problem thesis—foundations I look for when evaluating co-founder fit in any startup. Before writing a line of code, they intentionally aligned their skillsets, values and responsibilities. I emphasize this step in my own product management leadership practice: make the invisible explicit. Define roles, boundaries, and how decisions get made while the stakes are low, so you can move fast when the stakes are high. As the company grows, their rituals for spending valuable time together keep the relationship durable. They use thought-starter questions for deep discussions and even benefit from sharing an executive coach. I’ve seen this playbook consistently reduce friction: structured prompts surface misalignments early, while an external coach creates a safe container to reset, recommit, and keep momentum. We also dug into how they run the executive team at scale and sketch out decision rights. Clear decision rights accelerate execution, prevent rework, and protect the co-founders’ relationship from getting pulled into every operational knot. In my experience, codifying who decides, who contributes, and how dissent is handled is one of the fastest ways to boost operating cadence without sacrificing trust. Manu and Brian both offer practical advice to other founders—whether you’re in the early stages of looking for a co-founder or aiming to add a little magic to an existing partnership. If you’re building, apply their lessons: align on values early, institutionalize rituals, use an executive coach, and be explicit about decision rights. These are the simple, scalable mechanisms that preserve focus, speed, and resilience as you pursue product-market fit and scale your executive team. You can follow Manu at @manuaero and Brian at @RiegerB on Twitter.
    Book a consult png image
  • Rethinking Quitting: Annie Duke’s Decision Science for Smarter Product Strategy

    Rethinking Quitting: Annie Duke’s Decision Science for Smarter Product Strategy

    I recently sat down with Annie Duke, a retired pro poker player and First Round’s Special Partner focused on Decision Science. She’s also the author of the bestselling book, “Thinking in Bets.” Her latest work, “Quit: The Power of Knowing When to Walk Away,” offers a provocative lens on one of the most misunderstood skills in product management and startup leadership: the decision to stop.

    In our world, quitting is often dismissed as failure. We celebrate grit, persistence, and the legendary founders who “just kept going.” But in my experience leading product strategy, I’ve learned that knowing when to walk away is frequently the hallmark of great judgment. Annie’s perspective reframes quitting as a strategic move that preserves focus, accelerates learning, and ultimately improves outcomes.

    What struck me most is how our psychology conspires against sound walk-away decisions. We’re vulnerable to sunk cost fallacy, status quo bias, and identity-driven attachment to our bets. As product teams, that shows up as clinging to features that don’t move the needle, extending pilots that never convert, or chasing a go-to-market motion that looked good in a deck but stalls in reality.

    “Quit: The Power of Knowing When to Walk Away” argues that quitting, done right, is not capitulation—it’s optimization. I see that play out in product discovery and portfolio management. The teams that outperform define clear kill criteria up front, tie decisions to leading indicators rather than vanity metrics, and treat each initiative as a reversible bet until product-market fit evidence says otherwise.

    Practically, I’ve found a few tactics echo Annie’s approach: set timeboxed experiments with explicit stop-loss rules; pre-commit to thresholds that trigger a review; and separate decision rights so the person advocating for a project isn’t the sole decider on its continuation. Decision logs, red-team reviews, and base-rate comparisons help strip away narrative bias and keep us grounded in outcomes vs output OKRs.

    Annie also offers guidance for advice-givers—those moments when you need to nudge a teammate or founder to change course. Lead with curiosity, not combat. Ask, “If we were starting from zero today, would we choose this strategy?” Frame quitting as a path to the original goal, not a retreat from it. And when necessary, be gentle, yet firm—clarity is kind.

    For product leaders, the real unlock is weaving quitting into the operating system. Stage funding for initiatives, escalate the evidence bar as you invest more, and normalize regular “stop, pivot, or double-down” checkpoints. This keeps resources flowing to the highest-leverage bets and reduces the emotional tax on hard calls.

    If you’re rethinking your roadmap, pipeline, or GTM motions, this is the moment to institutionalize better walk-away decisions. Align quit criteria to business outcomes, define decision cadence, and coach teams to see quitting as learning in action. It’s how you create velocity toward product-market fit while minimizing opportunity cost.

    If this resonates, add “Quit: The Power of Knowing When to Walk Away” to your reading list. And if you want to keep up with the ideas behind decision science and strategic quitting, you can follow Annie on Twitter at @AnnieDuke.

    Quitting isn’t the opposite of perseverance—it’s how we preserve our best bets. When we treat walking away as a disciplined product management capability, we build stronger strategies, ship better products, and protect the most precious asset we have: time.


    Inspired by this post on First Round.


    Book a consult png image
  • Finding Product-Market Fit Twice: Alma’s bold pivot and tactics to stay close to customers

    Finding Product-Market Fit Twice: Alma’s bold pivot and tactics to stay close to customers

    Finding product-market fit is hard enough once; doing it twice is the rare pressure test that separates resilient product teams from the rest. As a product leader, I’m obsessed with how teams navigate pivots without losing sight of their users — and Alma’s journey is a masterclass in staying customer-obsessed while scaling.

    In a recent conversation with Harry Ritter, I dug into how disciplined product discovery, clear decision-making, and founder-led GTM can accelerate learning cycles. Harry Ritter, founder of Alma, a membership-based network that helps independent mental health care providers accept insurance and build thriving private practices.

    What stands out to me is that the Alma team essentially had to find product-market fit twice as they went from physical, co-working office spaces pre-pandemic, to quickly building out their virtual care capabilities. That’s an enormous shift in operating model, unit economics, provider experience, and buyer expectations — yet the throughline was a relentless focus on customer needs and outcomes.

    Team building matters even more during moments like these. Approaching team building as a solo founder means deliberately constructing complementary skills around the founder’s strengths and gaps. I look for three early anchors: an execution-first product partner, a zero-to-one GTM lead who can validate demand with founder energy, and a metrics-driven operator to keep the system healthy as complexity scales. Values, operating cadence, and decision rights must be explicit, or a pivot will expose the cracks.

    Refining the idea and getting more insights from your customers through structured interviews, using the technique doctors are trained on is a powerful way to de-bias signal. I’ve used this clinical-style approach — open-ended history, precise symptom probing, differential hypotheses, and a closing summary for confirmation — to improve customer interview quality. It transforms conversations from anecdote collection into consistent, comparable product data you can act on.

    When the ground shifts, rallying your team through a pivot depends on clarity and cadence. I anchor on a simple narrative: why the environment changed, what we’ve learned from customers, where we’re going, and how we’ll measure progress. Staying competitor aware — not competitor obsessed keeps speed and focus on the user, while avoiding reactive roadmaps. And it’s crucial to internalize The difference between building a marketplace versus a platform. Marketplaces require liquidity, trust, and incentive design; platforms demand extensibility, APIs, and ecosystem health. Confusing the two leads to misaligned KPIs and misallocated resources.

    My practical playbook for a “second PMF” includes: weekly founder-led customer calls until patterns converge; a structured interview template and central repository; a pivot memo with explicit kill criteria and success metrics; a liquidity or engagement model depending on whether you’re a marketplace or platform; and a tight KPI set (retention, activation, and quality-of-service indicators) to validate product-market fit beyond growth vanity metrics.

    Whether you’re in the early stages of starting a company or going through a tough pivot, there are tons of helpful tactics here. The Alma story reinforces a timeless truth: proximity to customers is the ultimate unfair advantage — in discovery, in execution, and especially in moments of change.

    You can follow Harry on Twitter at @harryritter1.


    Inspired by this post on First Round.


    Book a consult png image
  • Enterprise Messaging Secrets for Startups: Lessons I Took from Salesforce and Twilio

    Enterprise Messaging Secrets for Startups: Lessons I Took from Salesforce and Twilio

    I’m relentlessly focused on how enterprise-grade marketing translates into startup advantage—and how product and go-to-market stay in lockstep as companies scale. I connected with Sara Varni, CMO of Attentive, a conversational commerce platform. Before joining Attentive, Sara was Twilio’s CMO and spent 10 years as a senior marketing leader at Salesforce. Her journey offers a pragmatic blueprint for building a corporate message that actually drives pipeline, product adoption, and long-term category leadership.

    Early-stage teams often over-rotate on launch tactics and underinvest in the corporate narrative. The fix starts with discipline: define the problem you exist to solve, articulate a company-level promise (not just features), anchor it with three or four durable value pillars, and reinforce it with specific proof—customers, outcomes, and metrics. As I’ve seen firsthand, this narrative becomes the backbone for founder-led GTM, product roadmaps, and sales enablement, ensuring every touchpoint—from the homepage to the pitch deck—tells the same story.

    What stands out in Sara’s approach is the enterprise rigor behind message development. She takes us behind the scenes at how companies like Twilio and Salesforce craft a corporate message from the ground up, and tweak it as the company grows. That evolution is essential: your Series A message should feel sharper and more outcome-driven than your seed-stage one, and by growth stage, your story should clearly connect product capabilities to business value and category design.

    From a product management leadership perspective, I treat messaging as a living system. I instrument it with win/loss insights, run message tests in demand gen and on key sales calls, and feed the learning loop back into positioning and the roadmap. When the message resonates, you’ll see shorter sales cycles, tighter ICP focus, and cleaner handoffs from marketing to sales to customer success. When it doesn’t, it’s a signal to refine who you serve, the problems you prioritize, or the value proof points you bring forward.

    For marketers eyeing the CMO seat, one capability rises above the rest: commercial empathy. Build joint accountability with sales around pipeline quality and revenue, not just MQL volume. Establish regular, data-driven reviews where both teams refine ICP, test the narrative, and agree on proof customers. Most importantly, learn how to form collaborative, not combative relationships with sales counterparts. That partnership is how great messaging becomes a repeatable GTM motion.

    If you want to continue learning from leaders who’ve built category-defining narratives, you can follow Sara on Twitter at @SaraVarniBright. Use her enterprise playbook as scaffolding, then adapt it to your stage: keep the story simple, outcome-oriented, and relentlessly customer-backed—and let your product and sales motions amplify it in unison.


    Book a consult png image
  • Engineer Your GTM: Actionable Architecture, Refactoring, and Pricing Lessons from Rich Rao

    Engineer Your GTM: Actionable Architecture, Refactoring, and Pricing Lessons from Rich Rao

    I approach go-to-market like an engineer: define the system, design the interfaces, and be willing to refactor. Reflecting on lessons from Rich Rao affirmed that a rigorous, architecture-first mindset can turn messy GTM motions into a scalable operating system for product-led growth and B2B marketing.

    Rich Rao is the VP of the Small Business Group at Meta, where he manages the global revenue and operations for properties including Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. He also spent 10 years at Google, where he held a bunch of different go-to-market roles at the company, eventually becoming the GM for the Devices and Education verticals.

    In our discussion, he explains how his engineering background influences his approach to GTM — from an architecture method to the concept of refactoring. That frame resonates deeply with how I run product management leadership at scale: start with the blueprint, then iterate deliberately instead of stacking one-off tactics.

    We also wind back the clock to his earliest days at Google on the team that was building and selling Gmail for your domain. That story captures the zero to one B2B marketing muscle: when constraints are high, the “system design” of GTM matters more than any single channel.

    There are a ton of early startup mental models that Rich shares from this period in the company’s history, including why they ended up ditching free trials and his biggest pricing lessons. I’ve seen the same pattern: open-ended free trials often attract the wrong segments, inflate support load, and mask weak activation. Time-boxed or usage-capped trials tied to a clear value metric perform better, reduce churn, and sharpen SaaS pricing strategy.

    Here’s how I operationalize an engineering lens in GTM. First, I create an “architecture method” for distribution: define system boundaries (ICP, jobs-to-be-done), interfaces (hand-offs between marketing, sales, and product), and SLAs (lead response, onboarding, success). Second, I instrument everything to observe bottlenecks — then “refactor” GTM like code: remove dead channels, simplify packaging, and standardize the path to value. Third, I treat pricing as part of the design, not a late-stage patch: align paywalls with activation moments, use value-based metrics, and avoid feature sprawl that confuses buyers.

    When we need step changes, I run scheduled refactoring sprints: prune legacy offers, consolidate SKUs, and clarify messaging to reduce cognitive load. Just as technical debt slows product delivery, GTM debt (too many plans, inconsistent positioning, orphaned channels) drags conversion and expansion. A quarterly cadence to pay down this debt keeps the system healthy.

    The outcome is a repeatable motion: an engineered go-to-market system that compounds learning, supports product-market fit lessons, and scales across segments without breaking. If you lead product or growth, think like an architect, measure like an engineer, and refactor before your funnel stalls — your team, customers, and P&L will feel the difference.


    Book a consult png image
  • How Retool Hit $2M ARR Pre‑Launch: My Playbook on Developer Focus, Product‑Market Fit, and GTM

    How Retool Hit $2M ARR Pre‑Launch: My Playbook on Developer Focus, Product‑Market Fit, and GTM

    I spend my days building and scaling B2B products, and Retool’s journey to $2M in ARR before launch is a masterclass in focus. It’s also a case study I revisit when coaching teams on developer evangelism and founder-led GTM.

    Listening to David Hsu recount the early decisions made the strategy crisp: stay laser‑focused on developers, remove the boilerplate of internal tools, and earn trust with speed.

    Retool, a low-code platform for developers building custom internal tools.

    Today, Retool is valued at over $3 billion and has some of the biggest companies in the world building apps on its platform.

    Early on, plenty of smart folks thought the idea for Retool would fail and that the product’s developer focus would sink the company. I’ve heard variations of this skepticism whenever a team doubles down on a specific persona—especially developers.

    What struck me is the clarity around the target customer and the discipline to pursue language-market fit. When you get the words right for developers—their jobs-to-be-done, primitives, and constraints—you lower friction across product discovery, onboarding, and activation.

    Equally instructive is how Retool nabbed its earliest customers (which includes Brex, DoorDash and a Fortune 500 BigCo) and the way the team prioritized creating incredibly tight feedback cycles with these early evangelists. That’s founder-led GTM at its best: sit with users, ship fast, instrument everything, and turn customer conversations into a roadmap.

    On the surface, Retool’s path to product-market fit seems incredibly smooth. But as David tells it, there were plenty of bumps in the road — and he’s got tons of advice for early-stage founders that are finding their footing. I’ve lived those bumps, too; they’re signals to tighten the loop, not reasons to pivot away from your core user.

    My takeaways for product leaders: start with developer empathy, not feature breadth. Use founder bandwidth to run high-frequency user sessions, shadow internal tool builds, and test copy until you hit language-market fit. Treat docs, templates, and examples as part of the product; they often outperform UI tweaks for time-to-value.

    Operationally, stand up a lightweight, metrics-driven pipeline that connects discovery to delivery. I like a weekly cadence that pairs qualitative insights with activation, time-to-first-value, and expansion signals—classic product-market fit lessons that prevent local optimizations. When you see pull, lean into developer evangelism and zero to one B2B marketing, not paid acquisition.

    If I were replicating this playbook today, I’d deploy a small, forward-deployed team to embed with design partners, capture real workflows, and ship improvements daily. Pair that with clear outcomes vs output OKRs so the team optimizes for customer outcomes, not just shipping velocity. That’s how you earn trust with developers and translate it into durable ARR.

    Retool’s story reinforces a principle I teach often: conviction in the right user beats broad appeal every time. Focus wins, feedback compounds, and the market rewards teams that can turn skepticism into traction—especially when the users are developers.


    Book a consult png image